Launch Readiness Review
Get an independent launch-readiness verdict before you ship.
I review your actual app the way I review real-money systems: the failure paths, the ownership, the keys, the money. You get a recorded walkthrough and a written findings report. Every material finding includes evidence, impact, remediation guidance and a developer-ready handoff.
This is a scoped launch-readiness review. Applicable paths depend on how your app handles accounts, customer data, payments, integrations and production operations.
How it works
Submit the form
Your app URL, what it does, and what worries you most. Two minutes. No access details at this stage — those come after payment, over a secure channel.
Authorize access, then the clock starts
After payment you receive the written scope and secure access checklist. The 48-hour review window starts after payment, written authorization, agreed scope and complete usable access are all in place.
Receive the evidence and verdict
You receive a private recorded walkthrough, written findings, a GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO verdict, seven days of email clarification, and one recheck of agreed P0/P1 fixes submitted within seven days.
What you actually receive
This is the depth you get.
A representative page from an anonymized hardening report. Your report is as long as the evidence requires — normally 5–10 pages, never padded to hit a page-count promise.
- Payment paths — every state, including the failure ones that lose money quietly
- Ownership — domain, repository, hosting, database, and who can revoke what
- Keys and secrets — anything privileged reachable from a browser
- Auth and access — rate limiting, lockouts, and what a stuffing run would do
- Data — what is stored, who can read it, and what a leak would expose
- Launch readiness — a plain-language go / no-go with reasons attached
HARDENING REVIEW · PAGE 1 OF 9
Findings summary —
- P0
Payment webhook has no retry or reconciliation path
A failed delivery from is never retried and never reconciled. A customer can be charged while the app never records the order. Observed on during review.
- P0
Privileged key reachable from the browser bundle
The key is present in client-side JavaScript, bypassing every row-level rule configured on . Rotate, audit access logs, move calls server-side.
- P1
No rate limiting on authentication endpoints
Unlimited attempts against . Credential-stuffing traffic will find this within days of launch.
- P2
Repository owned by the build team, not the founder
Access can be revoked by . Transfer to an organisation you own before final payment.
Each finding in the full report carries reproduction steps, blast radius, a fix, and the exact sentence to send your developer. Client-identifying detail is redacted in this preview.
Evidence standard
Unknown is not the same as safe.
REPRODUCED
Safely reproduced in the authorized environment.
VERIFIED
A control or configuration was directly observed.
OBSERVED
Behavior was seen, but the full control path was not verified.
NOT VERIFIED
Required evidence was unavailable; this is never called a pass.
OUT OF SCOPE
Not reviewed under the purchased scope.
Not included
Clear limits before you pay.
- Formal penetration testing, exploit campaigns, or load/denial-of-service testing
- Legal, tax, privacy, PCI, GDPR, or other compliance certification
- A guarantee that every vulnerability, bug, or fraud path has been found
- Production data extraction, real card use, or testing systems you do not own
- Fix implementation of any kind — findings are never implemented by BuildVetted on a reviewed app
- Architecture rewrites or ongoing monitoring
- Exhaustive testing of every route in all nine areas — the review is scoped to the applicable critical paths agreed in writing
First 5 accepted projects
One app, one report, one recorded walkthrough. Follow-up questions included.
30-day money-back guarantee
CAPACITY
5 reviews a week
That is what I can do properly, not a countdown timer.
Objections
Fair questions before you pay.
Do I have to hand over passwords?
No. After payment I ask for the minimum read-only access needed for the specific things being checked, over a secure channel, and you revoke it the moment the report lands. If something can be checked without access, it is.
What if you find nothing serious?
Then the report says so, in writing, with what was checked and how — and you have documentation that your build is in good shape. That is a useful thing to own before you pay a final invoice.
How is this different from asking another developer to take a look?
A developer glancing at your app gives you a second opinion. This gives you an artifact: findings ranked by severity, each with reproduction steps and a fix, written so your existing developer can act on it without arguing about who is right.
Do you fix the problems you find?
No. I do not implement findings on apps I review. That separation keeps the verdict independent. Your current developer or another provider can use the developer-ready remediation notes, and the included recheck confirms whether the agreed P0/P1 findings were resolved.
Why is it async — can we not just have a call?
Because calls produce opinions and recordings produce evidence. A written report is something you can forward, quote in a dispute, and re-read in six months. It is also why this costs $99 instead of agency rates.
What if the report isn’t worth it?
30-day money-back guarantee. Email rohit@buildvetted.com within 30 days and you get a full refund — no form, no call, no explanation required. Keep the report either way.